This time last week South Africa were wondering what had hit them so hard that it was difficult for many to believe they could stagger to their feet in time to be floored again in the same ring. A week on, they're still wondering what hit them. But now they have a game to win. Yes, to win.
How had the astonishing turnaround been engineered? The South Africans had five days to try and pull themselves together before they had to return to Hagley Oval for the second Test.We're We're not really sure what went wrong," Rassie van der Dussen told an online press conference on Sunday about New Zealand's emphatic victory in the first Test. The visitors have given themselves a decent chance of denying New Zealand what would be their first Test series success over South Africa. "We prepared well and we knew what conditions we had, in terms of the swing and the grass on the wicket." Despite that the Kiwis won by an innings and 276 runs in only seven sessions, inflicting South Africa's second-heaviest defeat.
"We didn't change too much in terms of preparation for this Test," Van der Dussen said. "Maybe it's that extra week of getting used to the conditions and knowing what their bowlers are doing."
Maybe this is less about changing conditions and more about lived
experience: they knew they could do this because they had already done
it. But that doesn't fully explain how a side who were
bowled out for 95 and 111 and lost Zubayr Hamza - one of their sturdier
batters in that catastrophe of a first innings - to a thumb injury faced
the identical attack days later and made 364.That That the
pitch is browner, slower and, Van der Dussen said, drier than the
surface used in the first Test is a major factor in the South Africans'
resurrection.
"We've been under pressure before, in the previous series as well," Van der Dussen said, an allusion to South Africa's rousing fightback after losing the first Test of their home rubber against India in December and January to win the last two matches. "The way we came back said a lot about where we are."